ReviewBiology2025
Insights into the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Soft Tissue Manipulation.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of percussive therapy dosages on recovery from acute exercise-induced muscle damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Pooled it
- Visual monitoring in real-time improves consistency of 3D IASTM force applied to humans.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Observational
- Mechanisms and Efficacy of Massage Therapy for Post-Exercise Muscle Repair: A Narrative Review.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Myofascial release and fascial-targeted mechanical interventions in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: mechanisms, modalities, and integrative physiology.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft tissue manipulation (STM) is widely used by physical therapists, massage therapists, athletic trainers, and osteopathic physicians to manage musculoskeletal pain, yet its biological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Preclinical studies indicate that STM can alter immune cell behavior in animal models, increasing anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10) and reducing chemokines such as RANTES/CCL5. Single-cell transcriptomic analyses suggest mechanical treatment may reprogram stromal cells and shift immune cell recruitment in aged or inflamed tissues. However, many of these mechanistic findings have yet to be confirmed in human studies. Early clinical trials show massage therapy can modify circulating leukocytes and reduce cytokine responses, but direct tissue-level evidence in human subjects remains limited. This narrative review summarizes existing insights and emphasizes the need for future clinical investigations targeting populations with chronic inflammation, repetitive-use injuries, post-surgical fibrosis, or age-related muscle decline. We advocate for studies incorporating tissue or fluid sampling, cytokine profiling, and molecular assays such as flow cytometry or transcriptomics to characterize STM's immunological effects in people. Rather than simply easing symptoms, STM may act as a precision mechanical stimulus that recalibrates immune tone and promotes tissue repair. Bridging basic science with clinical research will be essential to establish STM as a biologically informed, mechanobiology-based therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.