ArticleBiology2025
Evaluating the Response to Cryopreservation of Ovine Fibroblast Spheroids.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell spheroids are widely studied for their potential applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The present work investigated the effects of cryopreservation on spheroids derived from ovine fibroblasts, depending on spheroid size (140 or 220 µm). Specifically, it explored how cryopreservation impacted several biological and physical parameters including cell damage, viability, metabolism, adhesion, proliferation, and spheroid mass density, weight, and diameter at three time points after thawing. A Live/Dead assay provided a visual assessment of cell damage, cell viability and metabolic activity were assessed by an Alamar Blue assay, and a replating assay evaluated cell adhesion and proliferation capabilities. Spheroid mass density, weight, and diameter were quantified by the W8 Biophysical Analyzer, creating accurate biophysical profiles. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis was employed to uncover gene expression changes following cryopreservation. Our findings indicate that spheroids measuring 140 µm in diameter largely maintained their biophysical features and cell viability post-cryopreservation, whereas those at 220 µm exhibited a decline in both vitality and mass density. The reduced vitality of 220 µm spheroids likely reflects size-related limitations in cryoprotectant diffusion and stress within the core. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of how cryopreservation affects ovine fibroblast spheroid biophysics and cellular integrity, laying the groundwork for improved preservation techniques for cell spheroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.