ReviewBiology2025
Deciphering the Fate of Burned Trees After a Forest Fire: A Systematic Review Focused on Conifers.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change is intensifying fire regimes, thereby challenging forest ecosystems and making it more difficult to predict the fate of burned trees. The significant ecological impacts of latent tree mortality remain poorly understood. In this study, we reviewed the scientific literature on latent tree mortality in conifer forests following wildfires or prescribed fires. A total of 2294 papers published between 2000 and 2024 were identified from Scopus and Web of Science databases. Using the PICO selection method, we included 16 relevant studies in the final analysis. These studies are based on field assessment, excluding remote sensing and controlled laboratory conditions. Our research revealed that latent mortality results from multiple forms of damage and environmental stressors that disrupt hydraulic function and carbon allocation, increasing tree vulnerability to secondary biotic and abiotic stressors. The discussion is structured around four thematic areas: physiology, ecophysiology, dendrochronology, and silviculture. This approach contributes to a deeper, interdisciplinary understanding of latent tree mortality. However, predicting it remains difficult, reflecting persistent knowledge gaps. Despite the limited literature on this specific field, our review highlights the need for integrated physiological indicators, such as sap flow, transpiration, nonstructural carbohydrates and glucose concentration, as well as long-term monitoring along many growing seasons to better assess tree survival after fire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.