ArticleBiomolecules2025
Predicted IL-18/IL-18R Binding Improvement Through Protein Interface Modification with Computer-Aided Design.
Article in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytokine-mediated immunotherapy has rapidly emerged as an effective alternative approach for cancer treatment by modulating the anti-tumor response. Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is considered as a promising cancer therapeutic agent due to the ability of cytokines to inhibit cancer by enhancing natural killer (NK) cell and cytotoxic T cell responses. Since the activity of IL-18 is required for the specific binding to IL-18 receptors, the modification of binding residue at the protein interface is an attractive strategy for IL-18 activity enhancement. The aim of this study was to design and predict mutations increasing the activity of IL-18 through computational structure-based energy calculation and molecular dynamic simulations. Four candidate mutations, E6M, E6M+N111S+R131G, E6M+K129M+R131G, and E6M+N111S+K129M+R131G, could affect/facilitate the receptor binding and stability compared to the wild-type via electrostatic interaction. MD simulations demonstrated that the predicted mutation on IL-18 had no influence on the overall conformation stability, but increased flexibility in the β8-β9 hairpin loop. Furthermore, the dynamic behavior suggested that these candidates could be an alternative for the improvement of IL-18 biological activity, though the full simulation of the IL-18 complex remains necessary. In summary, this study offered a computer-aided design strategy which was of beneficial use in the design and development of IL-18 to increase its cytokine potency and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.