ReviewCancers2025
Novel Molecular Insights and Evolution of Less Toxic Therapeutic Strategies in Burkitt Lymphoma.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burkitt Lymphoma-A Guide to Biological Features, Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Glofitamab in the sequential treatment of relapsed/refractory B-Cell lymphoma: a single-center real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell lymphoma that is characterized by rapid tumor proliferation and frequent extra-nodal involvement. While prompt diagnosis and initiation of highly intensive chemotherapy results in cure rates over 90% in children and adolescents, outcomes in adults are more modest, as comorbidities and advancing age may compromise treatment tolerability. In recent years, intermediate-intensity regimens have been developed for BL. These are highly effective in patients of all ages and associated with significantly less treatment-related toxicity compared to traditional high-dose chemotherapy. This was demonstrated in a recent randomized study of dose-intensive R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC compared to the reduced-intensity DA-EPOCH-R regimen, which was associated with equivalent outcomes but with significantly fewer side effects. Regardless of the chemotherapy platform, CNS involvement at baseline predicts a significantly inferior outcome, and the development of an optimal approach for these patients is an area of unmet need in BL therapeutics. Patients with relapsed or refractory disease following frontline therapy have very short survival times, as currently available salvage options are largely ineffective. In this regard, novel agents such as anti-CD19 CAR-T cells and bi-specific antibodies are under development in BL. It is hoped that progress in novel drug development, alongside improved understanding of BL biology, to further elucidate its genetic and epigenetic vulnerabilities, will lead to improved outcomes for patients in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.