Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41154400›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Pancreatic Cancer Detection in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN)-New Insights.

Wojciech Pawłowski, Mateusz Stefański, Barbara Włodarczyk, Łukasz Durko, Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wojciech PawłowskiDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.
Mateusz StefańskiDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.
Barbara WłodarczykDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0742-2305
Łukasz DurkoDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9818-5637
Ewa Małecka-WojcieskoDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1825-1807

Funding

Medical University of Lodz 503/1-002-01/503-11-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, particularly in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), remains challenging despite advances in imaging and biomarkers. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a high mortality rate; therefore, its early detection and adequate interventions are necessary to improve the disease outcome. Most IPMNs are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a preferred tool for diagnosing malignant IPMNs, with a sensitivity of 90.7-94.1% and a specificity of 84.7-87.2% in detecting mural nodules > 5 mm, a strong predictor of high-risk lesions. Radiomics further enhances diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 91-96%, specificity 78-81%), especially when combined with CA 19-9, which has lower sensitivity (73-90%) but higher specificity (79-95%). Computed tomography (CT), though less effective for small mural nodules, remains widely used; its accuracy improves with radiomics and clinical variables (sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 74%). Conventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) shows lower performance (sensitivity 60%, specificity 80%), but its advanced variations have improved outcomes. Contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) visualizes mural nodules with more than 90% sensitivity and involvement of the main pancreatic duct, with a sensitivity of 83.5% and a specificity of 87%. EUS-fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) allows cyst fluid analysis; however, CEA, glucose, and KRAS/GNAS mutations show poor value for malignancy risk. Cytology has low sensitivity (28.7-64.8%) but high specificity (84-94%) in diagnostic malignant changes and strongly affects further management. EUS-through-the-needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) yields high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 90%, specificity 95%) but carries a range of 2-23% adverse events, which limits its wide use. EUS-confocal laser endomicroscopy (EUS-nCLE) provides real-time microscopic evaluation, detecting malignant IPMN with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 73%, though its availability is limited. New emerging biomarkers available in cyst fluid or blood include mucins, miRNA panels (sensitivity 66.7-89%, specificity 89.7-100%), lipidomics, and cancer metabolite profiling, with diagnostic accuracy approaching 89-91%. Pancreatoscopy (POP) enables direct main pancreatic duct (MPD) visualization and biopsy with a sensitivity of 64-100% and a specificity of 75-100%, though adverse events occur in around 12% cases. Combining advanced imaging, EUS-based tissue acquisition, and novel biomarkers holds promise for earlier and more accurate detection of malignant IPMN, potentially improving PDAC outcomes.

Indexed as

CTEUSIPMNMRIpancreatic cancerpancreatic cystpancreatic cystic neoplasmradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41154400
PMCPMC12563920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.