ReviewCancers2025
Pancreatic Cancer Detection in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN)-New Insights.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: De-escalation of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms surveillance.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- EUS-Anchored Multimodal Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Toward a Conceptual Diagnostic Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW BASED ON INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Non-Invasive Blood Markers for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Grading.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, particularly in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), remains challenging despite advances in imaging and biomarkers. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a high mortality rate; therefore, its early detection and adequate interventions are necessary to improve the disease outcome. Most IPMNs are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a preferred tool for diagnosing malignant IPMNs, with a sensitivity of 90.7-94.1% and a specificity of 84.7-87.2% in detecting mural nodules > 5 mm, a strong predictor of high-risk lesions. Radiomics further enhances diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 91-96%, specificity 78-81%), especially when combined with CA 19-9, which has lower sensitivity (73-90%) but higher specificity (79-95%). Computed tomography (CT), though less effective for small mural nodules, remains widely used; its accuracy improves with radiomics and clinical variables (sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 74%). Conventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) shows lower performance (sensitivity 60%, specificity 80%), but its advanced variations have improved outcomes. Contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) visualizes mural nodules with more than 90% sensitivity and involvement of the main pancreatic duct, with a sensitivity of 83.5% and a specificity of 87%. EUS-fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) allows cyst fluid analysis; however, CEA, glucose, and KRAS/GNAS mutations show poor value for malignancy risk. Cytology has low sensitivity (28.7-64.8%) but high specificity (84-94%) in diagnostic malignant changes and strongly affects further management. EUS-through-the-needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) yields high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 90%, specificity 95%) but carries a range of 2-23% adverse events, which limits its wide use. EUS-confocal laser endomicroscopy (EUS-nCLE) provides real-time microscopic evaluation, detecting malignant IPMN with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 73%, though its availability is limited. New emerging biomarkers available in cyst fluid or blood include mucins, miRNA panels (sensitivity 66.7-89%, specificity 89.7-100%), lipidomics, and cancer metabolite profiling, with diagnostic accuracy approaching 89-91%. Pancreatoscopy (POP) enables direct main pancreatic duct (MPD) visualization and biopsy with a sensitivity of 64-100% and a specificity of 75-100%, though adverse events occur in around 12% cases. Combining advanced imaging, EUS-based tissue acquisition, and novel biomarkers holds promise for earlier and more accurate detection of malignant IPMN, potentially improving PDAC outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.