ArticleCancers2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Taiwan.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) compared with single-agent chemotherapy of the physician's choice (TPC) from the perspective of Taiwan's National Health Insurance.
methodsA partitioned survival model was developed to assess outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Clinical data were derived from the ASCENT trial, while direct medical costs were obtained from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA). Utility values were taken from published literature. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine parameter uncertainty and test the robustness of the results.
resultsIn the base-case analysis, SG was associated with an incremental cost of USD 121,836 per QALY gained-exceeding Taiwan's willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of USD 102,120. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that SG drug cost was the primary driver of ICER variability. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that reducing the price of SG by 50% increased the likelihood of cost-effectiveness.
conclusionsFrom the NHIA perspective, SG is not cost-effective for patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC at its current price. Substantial price reductions would be required for SG to become cost-effective under the WTP threshold of USD 102,120 per QALY.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.