ArticleCancers2025
Pulmonary Metastasectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Wedge Resection Versus Anatomic Resection for Single Metastases of Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPatients with single metastases from colorectal cancer constitute a subgroup with an excellent 5-year OS of 55-70% and with a real chance for cure. In this situation, local margin recurrence in the lung may impair the prognosis and thus is the main outcome target of surgery.
methodsA retrospective multicenter analysis of patients with single metastases from colorectal cancers was performed. Four German Thoracic Surgery units contributed data from their prospective metastasectomy databases. Statistical analysis was focused on tumor recurrence and risk factors for local margin recurrence.
results166 patients from four centers could be further analyzed. For later comparison, 93 (56%) anatomic resections and 73 (44%) non-anatomic resections were pooled. Tumor recurrence was detected: at any site 87/161 (54%), within the lung 62/161 (38.5%) at intrapulmonary margins 25/145 (17.2%) and in intrathoracic lymph nodes 14/138 (10.1%). Intrapulmonary local margin recurrence was more often found in non-anatomic (25.4%) versus anatomic (11.6%) resections (
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that anatomical resection of single CRC lung metastases is superior to non-anatomic resection with respect to local radicality and local intrapulmonary margin recurrence, but there was no difference in OS and RFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.