ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Perception of Generic Drugs Among Pharmacists in Poland: The Role of Sociodemographic Factors in Shaping Professional Attitudes and Practices.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation Gaps in Public Outpatient Drug Programs: A Survey of Physicians in Urban Primary Care in Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacists' perceptions and practices shape the real-world uptake of generic medicines. From a health-economics perspective, wider generic substitution reduces patient out-of-pocket spending and creates headroom in payer budgets for high-value interventions. We assessed attitudes toward the efficacy, safety, and use of generics and examined sociodemographic correlates among Polish pharmacists.
methodsAnalytical cross-sectional survey of licensed pharmacists in Poland was used (June-August 2025). The questionnaire covered reasons for recommending generics in long-term and single-use therapy; doubts about efficacy; views on bioequivalence testing; patient-reported experiences; and Likert-scale opinions on innovation, safety, efficacy, access, and payer savings. Associations were tested with χ
resultsOf 342 respondents (67.5% women; 74.9% community pharmacists), cost was the leading reason to recommend generics in long-term therapy (91.0%), followed by efficacy (53.0%) and safety (51.5%); for single-use prescriptions, cost remained central (76.2%), with lower emphasis on efficacy (47.5%) and safety (45.0%). Pharmacists who never recommend generics were older and more experienced (
conclusionsPolish pharmacists largely view generics as clinically equivalent and system-enhancing, with cost the dominant driver of recommendation. Targeted education-especially for hospital settings and specialized pharmacists-and attention to patient-reported experiences may further strengthen confidence and appropriate use of generics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.