ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Endotoxin Activity Assay-Guided Patient Selection for Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion: Lessons from the TIGRIS Trial and Future Directions.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision medicine in sepsis: lessons from the TIGRIS trial and the reawakening of targeted therapy.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Endotoxin Activity Assay-guided Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion: From Failed Trials to Biological Enrichment.Juntendo medical journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis and septic shock remain leading global causes of mortality, with endotoxin from Gram-negative bacteria playing a central role in their pathophysiology. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) was developed as an adjunctive therapy to directly remove circulating endotoxin in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Early clinical trials yielded conflicting results, largely due to challenges in patient selection. The endotoxin activity assay (EAA) has been investigated as a biomarker to identify patients most likely to benefit, but its limitations include indirect measurement, variability, and poor specificity. The recently completed TIGRIS trial, which enrolled septic shock patients with intermediate EAA values (0.60-0.89) and high organ dysfunction, demonstrated a significant survival benefit, thereby validating a targeted, precision medicine approach. This review critically appraises the role of EAA in guiding PMX-HP, highlights the lessons learned from the TIGRIS trial, and discusses complementary strategies such as integrating additional biomarkers, organ dysfunction scoring, and clinical phenotyping. Future research should embed EAA within multi-dimensional frameworks to optimize patient selection and establish PMX-HP as a precision therapy for endotoxemic sepsis and septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.