ArticleBrain sciences2025
Distinguishing Among Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia with a Brief Multimodal Test of Nouns and Verbs.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) variants include the non-fluent agrammatic (nfvPPA), logopenic (lvPPA), and semantic (svPPA), which differ in their effects on speech production. However, their impact on modality (oral vs. written) and grammatical word class (nouns vs. verbs) remains controversial. A significant effect of these variables might assist in classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study used first-visit data from 300 participants with PPA who completed oral and written noun and verb naming (matched in surface word frequency across word class) to test the hypothesis that the three variants show differential impairment on word class or modality. Group differences were evaluated with rank-transformed repeated measures ANOVA. Within individual differences between nouns and verbs and between oral and written modalities were tested with Fisher's exact tests.
resultsA significant modality × variant interaction (
conclusionsDiffering modality and word class patterns characterize PPA variants, with nfvPPA more accurate in nouns than verbs on average. Within individuals, only those with svPPA occasionally showed significantly more proficient verb than noun naming. Grammatical word class effects likely arise at distinct levels of cognitive processing underlying naming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.