Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41154129›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2025

Neurostimulation in the Middle East: What Do We Know So Far? A Narrative Review.

Ahmad H Almadani, Sumaiya Nishat, Ghada K Alrashed, Abdullah J Alghanim, Ayedh H Alghamdi, Mohammed A Aljaffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmad H AlmadaniDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4490-3220
Sumaiya NishatDepartment of Special Education, Alamad International School, Riyadh 14227, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-5596
Ghada K AlrashedDepartment of Psychiatry, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0001-8410-790X
Abdullah J AlghanimDepartment of Psychiatry, King Fahad Hospital of The University, Khobar 34445, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0009-6135-421X
Ayedh H AlghamdiDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0009-5452-0961
Mohammed A AljafferDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0345-5567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health disorders are increasingly being recognized as a major global challenge. In the Arabic-speaking Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, this challenge is compounded by sociocultural stigma, political instability, and limited mental health infrastructure, all of which restrict access to effective care. While neurostimulation modalities such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have proven effective and are gaining traction, their use in the MENA region remains limited and underexplored. This narrative review aims to bridge critical gaps by examining knowledge levels, attitudes, perceptions, and the clinical application and accessibility of ECT and rTMS across Arabic-speaking countries. We searched multiple databases using keywords related to neurostimulation and psychiatry, covering all 22 Arabic-speaking MENA countries. Studies were included if they were published in English and were related to psychiatric applications of ECT or rTMS. Findings were categorized by geography and grouped into four thematic domains: knowledge, perception, availability, and clinical use. The findings revealed an uneven distribution of neurostimulation research and services across the region; ECT is more established than rTMS. Additionally, public awareness remains low, and high levels of stigma persist. Among clinicians, psychiatrists tend to support neurostimulation, while general medical staff show mixed opinions. rTMS is gaining clinical interest but remains limited in accessibility due to high costs and limited infrastructure. Although neurostimulation should be more widely implemented in psychiatry in the MENA region, it is still underrecognized and underused. Region-specific strategies addressing stigma, training gaps, and policy standardization are essential to optimize neurostimulation use and its public acceptance.

Indexed as

electroconvulsive therapyMiddle Eastneurostimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41154129
PMCPMC12563586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.