ReviewBrain sciences2025
Neurostimulation in the Middle East: What Do We Know So Far? A Narrative Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health disorders are increasingly being recognized as a major global challenge. In the Arabic-speaking Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, this challenge is compounded by sociocultural stigma, political instability, and limited mental health infrastructure, all of which restrict access to effective care. While neurostimulation modalities such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have proven effective and are gaining traction, their use in the MENA region remains limited and underexplored. This narrative review aims to bridge critical gaps by examining knowledge levels, attitudes, perceptions, and the clinical application and accessibility of ECT and rTMS across Arabic-speaking countries. We searched multiple databases using keywords related to neurostimulation and psychiatry, covering all 22 Arabic-speaking MENA countries. Studies were included if they were published in English and were related to psychiatric applications of ECT or rTMS. Findings were categorized by geography and grouped into four thematic domains: knowledge, perception, availability, and clinical use. The findings revealed an uneven distribution of neurostimulation research and services across the region; ECT is more established than rTMS. Additionally, public awareness remains low, and high levels of stigma persist. Among clinicians, psychiatrists tend to support neurostimulation, while general medical staff show mixed opinions. rTMS is gaining clinical interest but remains limited in accessibility due to high costs and limited infrastructure. Although neurostimulation should be more widely implemented in psychiatry in the MENA region, it is still underrecognized and underused. Region-specific strategies addressing stigma, training gaps, and policy standardization are essential to optimize neurostimulation use and its public acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.