ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimising Extraction of Specific Food Allergens from Challenging Food Matrices for Immunoassay Quantification.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioassays in Allergy: Technical Characteristics, Limitations, and Pathways to Clinical Implementation-An EAACI Position Paper.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Review
- Feed Components and Egg Allergenicity: Impact of Lupin and Soybean Meal Inclusion on Hen Egg Immunoreactivity (ELISA-Based Study).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Baking results in impaired detection of clinically relevant food allergens.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simultaneous extraction of multiple clinically relevant, specific allergens from complex, processed foods for immunoassay quantification remains challenging. Moreover, shared extraction buffers remain elusive, which limits the effectiveness of multiplex (multi-target) technology. This study aimed to optimise extraction of specific allergens from challenging food samples and identify shared methods of extraction for multiplex analysis. Incurred processed food matrices (chocolate dessert, raw and baked biscuit) were prepared and extracted with 10 different buffers varying in base, pH, and additive content. Extracts were analysed by allergen-specific multiplex array and ELISA. Optimised recovery of 14 food allergens was obtained from complex incurred matrices using two extraction buffers: 50 mM carbonate bicarbonate with 10% fish gelatine, and PBS with 2%-Tween, 1 M NaCl with 10% fish gelatine and 1% PVP. In most cases, optimised buffers provided 50-150% recovery from incurred foods. Matrices that contained chocolate or were subject to thermal processing had lower recoveries. Optimised allergen extraction methods can be used to analyse foods associated with treatment and prevention of allergy and reference materials for clinically relevant allergen content and identify allergen contamination. Identification of shared, optimised extraction buffers will result in increased sample throughput in multiplex immunoassay techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.