ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Preliminary Study of Swell-Drying as an Innovative Process for Improving the Nutritional Quality of Dried Lucuma (
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lucuma and goldenberry are rich in bioactive compounds, and swell-drying (SD) can help preserve these properties. This study examined how SD impacts the nutritional quality of lucuma and goldenberry. The SD process involved the following: (1) initial pre-drying, with Interval Highly Active Drying (IHAD) for lucuma and Continuous Convective Airflow Drying (CCAD) for goldenberry, (2) a DIC treatment under an experimental design with 13 treatments, and (3) a final CCAD step. The parameters studied for DIC were steam pressure (0.1 to 0.5 MPa) and treatment time (5 to 55 s). Bromatological analysis and antioxidant activity were the response variables. Under accurate SD conditions, both fruits maintained their nutritional quality and increased their antioxidant activity compared to controls. Carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, fiber, and ash average contents of lucuma were 88.73%, 7.28%, 1.18%, 1.88%, and 0.92%, respectively. The DIC treatment of 0.27 MPa for 22 s increased the percentage of ABTS and the DPPH inhibition of lucuma by 1.2 and 1.5 times, respectively. For goldenberry, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, fiber, and ash average contents were 71.87%, 7.18% 7.01%, 6.60%, and 6.77%, respectively. DIC treatment of goldenberry at 0.5 MPa for 30 s increased ABTS % inhibition by 1.5 times, and DIC at 0.10 MPa for 30 s increased DPPH inhibition by 4.9%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.