Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153957›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Foundations of Livestock Behavioral Recognition: Ethogram Analysis of Behavioral Definitions and Its Practices in Multimodal Large Language Models.

Siling Zhou, Wenjie Li, Mengting Zhou, Ryan N Dilger, Isabella C F S Condotta, Zhonghong Wu, Xiangfang Tang, Yiqi Wu, Tao Wang, Jiangong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siling ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, 2 W Yuanmingyuan Ave, Beijing 100193, China.
Wenjie LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, 2 W Yuanmingyuan Ave, Beijing 100193, China.
Mengting ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2 W Yuanmingyuan Ave, Beijing 100193, China.
Ryan N DilgerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1207 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-2845
Isabella C F S CondottaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1207 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3130-7668
Zhonghong WuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, 2 W Yuanmingyuan Ave, Beijing 100193, China.
Xiangfang TangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2 W Yuanmingyuan Ave, Beijing 100193, China.
Yiqi WuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, 2 W Yuanmingyuan Ave, Beijing 100193, China.
Tao WangAniEye Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311215, China.
Jiangong LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, 2 W Yuanmingyuan Ave, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2022YFD1301104Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2023YFD2000703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision offers a promising approach to automating the observation of animal behavior, thereby contributing to improved animal welfare and precision livestock management. However, the absence of standardized behavioral definitions limits the accuracy and generalizability of artificial intelligence models used for behavior recognition. This study applied natural language processing techniques to analyze 655 behavior definitions related to feeding, drinking, resting, and moving, as reported in the livestock research literature published between 2000 and 2023. Clustering and structural analyses revealed consistent semantic patterns across behavior categories. Feeding and drinking behaviors were concisely defined in 6-10 words, including the semantic elements of body parts, actions, and action objects. Resting and moving behaviors were described in 6-15 words. Resting behavior was defined by actions and action objects, while moving behaviors were characterized by action words only. By integrating these structured definitions into prompts, ChatGPT-4o achieved an average correspondence score of 4.53 out of 5 in an image-based piglet behavior annotation task. These findings highlight the value of standardized behavior definitions in supporting more accurate and generalizable behavior recognition models for precision livestock farming.

Indexed as

animal welfarecomputer visionethogramlanguageprecision livestock farming

Identifiers

PMID41153957
PMCPMC12561510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.