ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Rare Primate
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses a critical challenge in global conservation: understanding how rare species contribute to ecosystem structure and resilience. The ecological role of the endangered black-and-white snub-nosed monkey in China's temperate mountain forests was examined, with the hypothesis that its tree-shaking behavior alters forest structure and microclimates to enhance ecosystem health. To assess long-term impacts, current monkey-inhabited forests were compared with historical sites abandoned over decades, by analyzing tree gaps, forest structure, and environmental conditions. Monkeys' canopy-disturbing actions were also directly observed. Findings revealed monkey activity created more canopy gaps (38.3% in current habitats vs. 29.9~33.5% in abandoned sites) and altered microclimate conditions, which boosted plant diversity and optimized the community's vertical and age structures. Current forests supported nearly twice as many tree species, 2.5 times as many shrub species, and threefold more herb species than areas abandoned for 40 years. Even 20 years after monkeys disappeared, abandoned sites retained higher diversity and gaps, showing lasting ecological benefits. These results confirm the monkey's vital role as a resilience promoter, demonstrating how rare species can shape healthier ecosystems. This highlights the need to prioritize protecting such species, as their survival not only preserves biodiversity but also sustains ecosystem functions crucial for human well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.