Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153916›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

What if Horses Were Humans? Comparing Rein Tension and Bit Pressures to Human Pressure Pain Thresholds.

Frauke Musial, Thomas Weiss

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frauke MusialNational Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0074-343X
Thomas WeissDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1312-1018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bit pressure and rein tension-induced mouth pain in horses have recently become a significant welfare concern, fueling debates within the equestrian community and beyond. Evidence indicates that bits can cause pain-related behaviors and even oral lesions. Although studying pressure-induced pain in animals is challenging, the similarities in the physiology of pain processing (nociception) across mammals suggest that it is reasonable to assume that pain perception in humans and horses is principally comparable. Therefore, we compared human pressure pain detection thresholds (PPDTs) to reported rein pressures in equestrian sports as reported in the scientific literature. Reported rein tensions (kPa) range from a minimum of 91.2-107.87 to a maximum of 1314.09-4285.51, while human PPDTs (in kPa) are 232.4 for the face, 445.3 for the hand, and 535.5 for the foot. These comparisons reveal that only the lowest reported bit pressures would be pain-free for humans. Average to maximum pressures would cause strong to severe pain sensations in humans. Furthermore, data on pressure pain-induced stimulus response functions suggest that bit pressures commonly encountered in equestrian sports could cause lesions in humans, making them unacceptable in human experimentation. In conclusion, bit pressures as reported in the scientific literature would cause significant pain if applied to humans, raising welfare concerns for horses.

Indexed as

animal welfarebit pressureequestrian sportshorsehumanpressure painpressure pain detection thresholdsrein tensionstimulus response function

Identifiers

PMID41153916
PMCPMC12560900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.