ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Refining Electronic Tagging of Marine Animals: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Pelagic Sharks.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methods for tagging whale sharks: insights into performance and best practices with a focus on clamp attachments.Animal biotelemetry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal-borne tags are widely used for tracking and monitoring the movements, behaviour, and ecology of marine animals. Tagging can, however, adversely affect the hydrodynamic force balance and welfare of tagged animals, and consequently, the reliability and accuracy of data, such as by increasing drag, altering swimming characteristics, and reducing the survival rate of tagged animals. Therefore, it is important to understand and quantify the impact of tagging on marine animal hydrodynamics and to optimize the choice of tag and attachment position. In this study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling is used to simulate the flow around tagged and untagged mako sharks (Lamnidae) across their swim speed range for two dominant tag shapes, tagging sites, and body sizes. The results indicate that fin mounted tags can have a significant impact on shark hydrodynamics and energetic balance, increasing drag between 17.6% and 31.2% for a mako shark (2.95 m fork length) across the range of flow velocities tested (0.5 to 9.1 m/s). In comparison, the optimal tagging site for archival tags attached to the dorsal musculature leads to a minimal increase in drag for the larger sharks (>1.5 m), which becomes considerable for small sharks (1 m fork length; 5.1% to 7.6% increase) and leads to an average energetic cost equivalent to 7% of the daily energetic requirement of an untagged animal. Other aspects of the force balance are considered, which reveal a range of varied and complex effects. Recommendations for animal size thresholds (>1.5 m FL) and refinements of tagging practice are suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.