Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153873›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Genomic Selection for Cashmere Traits in Inner Mongolian Cashmere Goats Using Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, Extreme Gradient Boosting and Light Gradient Boosting Machine Methods.

Jiaqi Liu, Xiaochun Yan, Wenze Li, Shan-Hui Xue, Zhiying Wang, Rui Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaqi LiuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Xiaochun YanCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Wenze LiCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Shan-Hui XueCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Zhiying WangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8710-319X
Rui SuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8386-7408

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA No. CARS-39National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1300204National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFE0113300Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China 2025JQ022Outstanding Youth Science Fund Cultivation Project of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University BR230304Program for Innovative Research Team in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region NMGIRT2322Special A-class Team Project for Research and Innovation Team Construction of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University BR251201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) has garnered increasing attention for its applications in genomic prediction. ML effectively processes high-dimensional genomic data and establishes nonlinear models. Compared to traditional Genomic Selection (GS) methods, ML algorithms enhance computational efficiency and offer higher prediction accuracy. Therefore, this study strives to achieve the optimal machine learning algorithm for genome-wide selection of cashmere traits in Inner Mongolian cashmere goats. This study compared the genomic prediction accuracy of cashmere traits using four machine learning algorithms-Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting Tree (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and LightGBM-based on genotype data and cashmere trait phenotypic data from 2299 Inner Mongolian cashmere goats. The results showed that after parameter optimization, LightGBM achieved the highest selection accuracy for fiber length (56.4%), RF achieved the highest selection accuracy for cashmere production (35.2%), and GBDT achieved the highest selection accuracy for cashmere diameter (40.4%), compared with GBLUP, the accuracy improved by 0.8-2.7%. Among the three traits, XGBoost exhibited the lowest prediction accuracy, at 0.541, 0.309, and 0.387. Additionally, following parameter optimization, the prediction accuracy of the four machine learning methods for cashmere fineness, cashmere yield, and fiber length improved by an average of 2.9%, 2.7%, and 3.8%, respectively. The mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) for all machine learning methods also decreased, indicating that hyperparameter tuning can enhance prediction accuracy in ML algorithms.

Indexed as

genomic selectionInner Mongolian cashmere goatsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41153873
PMCPMC12560873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.