Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153751›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Animal Models as Foundational Tools in Preclinical Orthopedic Implant Research.

Renata Maria Varut, Diana-Maria Trasca, George Alin Stoica, Carmen Sirbulet, Cristian Cosmin Arsenie, Cristina Popescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renata Maria VarutResearch Methodology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Diana-Maria TrascaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
George Alin StoicaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Carmen SirbuletENT Doctor Department of Anatomy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Discipline of Anatomy, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Cristian Cosmin ArsenieENT Doctor Department of Anatomy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Discipline of Anatomy, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Cristina PopescuENT Doctor Department of Anatomy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Discipline of Anatomy, 200349 Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthopedic implants have a critical role in modern medical practice, being useful in bone regeneration, joint arthroplasty, and healing fractures. The success of osseointegration depends on implant properties (composition, stability, geometry, biocompatibility) and host factors (local reactivity, comorbidities). Preclinical evaluation in animal models is essential before clinical application. In orthopedic implantology, the selection and real utility of a range of animals are important, with an emphasis placed on bone-implant interface, biomechanical function, and long-term integration. Smaller animals such as rabbits and rats have widespread use in early biocompatibility and osseointegration testing, but larger animals such as pigs, sheep, and canines have a larger physiological bone similarity and can, therefore, be utilized for bearing loads in testing. Considering the utility and disadvantages of certain species-including suitability for new biomaterials, coatings, and biomechanical function-this article discusses testing methodologies such as push-out/pull-out tests, histomorphometry, and micro-CT and their utility in testing the integration of implants and regeneration of bone. Conclusions confirm a multi-species model in use in preclinical testing for the development of implants and improvements in clinical success. Unlike previous reviews, this article emphasizes translational strategies, integrates ethical perspectives in model selection, and discusses the synergistic use of imaging modalities with biomechanical tests for comprehensive assessment.

Indexed as

animal modelsbiocompositesbiomechanical analysisbone regenerationhistomorphometrymicro-CT imagingorthopedic implantsosseointegrationpreclinical testing

Identifiers

PMID41153751
PMCPMC12561796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.