ReviewBiomedicines2025
Recurrent Erysipelas: Clinical Challenges and Strategies for Prevention-A Narrative Literature Review.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epithelial-Dermal Immune Memory: TrackingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent erysipelas is a common and clinically significant condition that poses challenges for both patients and healthcare systems. Each episode may damage lymphatic vessels, leading to chronic lymphedema, which perpetuates the risk of further relapses. Recurrence rates remain high, ranging from 11% in outpatients during the first year to up to 46% of hospitalized patients within three years. The lower limbs are the most frequent site, although recurrences may also occur in other regions, such as the upper limb after mastectomy with lymph node dissection. This review summarizes current knowledge on risk factors, preventive measures, and chemoprophylaxis in recurrent erysipelas. Modifiable risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, venous insufficiency, tinea pedis, and poor hygiene play an important role, while non-modifiable factors include age, sex, and a history of prior episodes. Non-pharmacological strategies-weight reduction, glycemic control, smoking cessation, compression therapy, and meticulous skin care-form the cornerstone of prevention and may reduce the need for long-term antibiotics. Antibiotic prophylaxis, most commonly with oral penicillin V or intramuscular benzathine penicillin, has been shown to lower recurrence rates. However, efficacy may be reduced in patients with chronic edema or severe obesity. Macrolides serve as alternatives in penicillin-allergic patients, but concerns remain about resistance, adverse effects, and drug-drug interactions. In conclusion, recurrent erysipelas requires a multifaceted approach. While antibiotic prophylaxis is effective, its long-term success depends on simultaneous management of underlying conditions. Further studies are needed to define optimal regimens, treatment duration, and non-antibiotic alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.