Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153731›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Recurrent Erysipelas: Clinical Challenges and Strategies for Prevention-A Narrative Literature Review.

Dominika Maria Jaskóła-Polkowska, Krystian Blok, Anna Skibińska, Andrzej Chciałowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Epithelial-Dermal Immune Memory: TrackingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominika Maria Jaskóła-PolkowskaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, 128 Szaserów Street, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6902-6722
Krystian BlokDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, 128 Szaserów Street, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0009-3393-4831
Anna SkibińskaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, 128 Szaserów Street, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej ChciałowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, 128 Szaserów Street, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6444-4124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent erysipelas is a common and clinically significant condition that poses challenges for both patients and healthcare systems. Each episode may damage lymphatic vessels, leading to chronic lymphedema, which perpetuates the risk of further relapses. Recurrence rates remain high, ranging from 11% in outpatients during the first year to up to 46% of hospitalized patients within three years. The lower limbs are the most frequent site, although recurrences may also occur in other regions, such as the upper limb after mastectomy with lymph node dissection. This review summarizes current knowledge on risk factors, preventive measures, and chemoprophylaxis in recurrent erysipelas. Modifiable risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, venous insufficiency, tinea pedis, and poor hygiene play an important role, while non-modifiable factors include age, sex, and a history of prior episodes. Non-pharmacological strategies-weight reduction, glycemic control, smoking cessation, compression therapy, and meticulous skin care-form the cornerstone of prevention and may reduce the need for long-term antibiotics. Antibiotic prophylaxis, most commonly with oral penicillin V or intramuscular benzathine penicillin, has been shown to lower recurrence rates. However, efficacy may be reduced in patients with chronic edema or severe obesity. Macrolides serve as alternatives in penicillin-allergic patients, but concerns remain about resistance, adverse effects, and drug-drug interactions. In conclusion, recurrent erysipelas requires a multifaceted approach. While antibiotic prophylaxis is effective, its long-term success depends on simultaneous management of underlying conditions. Further studies are needed to define optimal regimens, treatment duration, and non-antibiotic alternatives.

Indexed as

antibiotic prophylaxislymphedemaprevention strategiesrecurrent erysipelasrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41153731
PMCPMC12561274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.