ReviewBiomedicines2025
Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Corticosteroid-Refractory Multiple Sclerosis Relapses: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Integration into Clinical Practice.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute neurological deficit following lumbar microdiscectomy: a multiple sclerosis relapse mimicking a surgical complication - a case report and literature review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is increasingly recognized as a critical escalation therapy for managing acute multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses refractory to high-dose corticosteroids. Neuropathological and clinical evidence implicate humoral immune mechanisms, particularly autoantibodies, immune complexes, and complement activation, as key pathogenic drivers in a subset of MS attacks, notably those consistent with immunopathological pattern II. By removing these circulating immune effectors, TPE provides a rational strategy to dampen inflammation and promote neurological recovery. This review integrates current mechanistic insights with clinical efficacy data and practical implementation strategies for TPE in corticosteroid-refractory MS. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational cohorts demonstrates moderate-to-marked functional improvement in 40-60% of patients, with the greatest benefit observed when therapy is initiated within 14 days of symptom onset and cases demonstrating active inflammatory lesions on MRI. Predictors of a favorable response include younger age, short disease duration, severe syndromes involving optic nerve, brainstem, or spinal cord, and CSF markers of intrathecal B-cell activity. Although TPE is generally well tolerated in experienced centers, its broader adoption of TPE is limited by variability in access, institutional protocols, and provider familiarity. Standardization of treatment algorithms, validation of predictive biomarkers, and incorporation into streamlined clinical pathways are critical to maximizing its clinical impact. Future priorities include comparative trials against alternative escalation therapies, biomarker-guided patients' selection, and comprehensive health-economic evaluations. Taken together, current evidence and recommendations from major neurology and apheresis societies support TPE as a valuable therapeutic modality capable of significantly improving relapse outcomes in appropriately selected MS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.