Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153632›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

MOGAD: A Shifting Landscape-From Pathogenesis to Personalised Management, Global Perspectives and Latin American Insights.

Ethel Ciampi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Movement Disorders in MOGAD: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ethel CiampiDepartamento de Neurología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330077, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-7330-5433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) has emerged as a distinct autoimmune demyelinating disorder, characterised by clinical, radiological, and immunopathological features that differentiate it from Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and AQP4+ neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD). This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the evolving landscape of MOGAD, from its immunopathogenesis and diagnostic criteria to treatment strategies and global epidemiological insights. We explore the role of MOG-IgG antibodies in disease mechanisms, the utility of emerging biomarkers, and the prognostic value of tools like clinical scores or longitudinal MOG-IgG assessment. Special attention is given to regional disparities, with a focus on Latin America, highlighting diagnostic delays, access inequities, and unique clinical phenotypes. We also examine the limitations of current evidence, including gaps in long-term longitudinal follow-up and variability in diagnostic testing. Finally, we discuss global collaborative efforts and clinical trials that are shaping the future of personalised care in MOGAD. As the field advances, integrating biomarker-driven monitoring, equitable access to therapies, and regionally adapted guidelines will be essential to improving outcomes for patients worldwide.

Indexed as

epidemiologyLATAMLatin AmericaMOGADmyelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated diseasepathophysiologyprognosistreatment

Identifiers

PMID41153632
PMCPMC12561739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.