ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Understanding Pain and Quality of Life in Paediatric Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review with a Focus on Early Survivorship.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chronic Cancer-Related Pain in Children: A Narrative Review of Multimodal and Family-Centered Palliative Care Approach.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain is a common but often under-recognized clinical feature among children and young people (CYP) cancer survivors. This systematic review aimed to examine the prevalence of acute and chronic pain in 5-24-year-old cancer survivors, explore associated biopsychosocial comorbidities and evaluate the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools used with this population.
methodsThis review provides a conceptual replication to a review published in 2020 by Schulte et al. by updating and purposefully narrowing the review population to CYP (5-24 y) to better capture their pain experience. We updated the search from Schulte et al., extending the search period up to October 2024 across 5 databases.
resultsOur independent search identified 18 studies, with only 1 new paper published since Schulte et al., 2020. Overall, CYP cancer survivors reported a higher prevalence of pain than the general population, with females experiencing higher levels than males, consistent with broader chronic pain literature. Fatigue, depression, and anxiety were common comorbidities, and pain substantially impacted quality of life. Key limitations included the use of unvalidated questionnaires; inconsistent definitions of chronic pain and lack of patient stratification based on diagnoses, age and treatment protocol. Moreover, data were aggregated, and we were unable to extract information from early survivorship.
conclusionsThere is a critical need for more rigorous research on pain in CYP cancer survivors. Specifically, gathering data on pain experienced during the immediate post-treatment completion phase of cancer care, an area currently underrepresented in the literature, will provide valuable insights into patients' pain trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.