ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evidence-Based Medicine and Good Clinical Practice in Research in Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Practicing medical research based on the best evidence is gaining increased value and popularity among most medical societies in the current era. Good clinical practice (GCP) is internationally recognized as the scientific and ethical standard for the design, conduct, performance, auditing, recording, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials involving human subjects. GCP ensures the accuracy and credibility of trial while safeguarding the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of participants. Adherence to GCP facilitates the generation of high-quality studies that can be incorporated in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). The clinical practice of EBM seeks to integrate robust medical literature into daily medical practice. This process involves systematically searching for high-quality evidence, critically appraising the retrieved literature, applying sound clinical principles and finally evaluating the efficacy of the chosen approach. Although EBM has been evaluated in many resource settings, it has not been addressed sufficiently in the field of Pediatrics and more specifically in indigenous populations. In this review, we briefly explain the EBM approach and its applications in Pediatrics, in order to help physicians care for young subjects more efficiently by integrating the best available information into their routine clinical practice. Also, the basic good practice principles for conducting clinical trials in children and adolescents are highlighted, emphasizing the importance of applying high ethical principles in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.