Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153352›Full record

ArticleGenes2025

Integrative Multi-Omics Characterization and Structural Insights into the Poorly Annotated Integrin

Ximena Aixa Castro Naser, Alessandro Cestaro, Silvio C E Tosatto, Emanuela Leonardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ximena Aixa Castro NaserDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9211-1255
Alessandro CestaroInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR-IBIOM), 70126 Bari, Italy.
Silvio C E TosattoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-7793
Emanuela LeonardiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-8461

Funding

European Commission 101182949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate annotation of gene isoforms remains one of the major obstacles in translating genomic data into meaningful biological insight. Laminin-binding integrins, particularly integrin α6 (

methodsWe combined comparative genomics across primates with targeted re-alignment to assess exon conservation and annotation fidelity; analyzed RNA-seq for exon-level usage; applied splice-site prediction to evaluate inclusion potential; surveyed cancer mutation resources for exon-specific variants; and used structural/disorder modeling to infer effects on the β-propeller.

resultsExon X2 is conserved at the genomic level but inconsistently annotated, reflecting the limitations of current annotation pipelines rather than genuine evolutionary loss. RNA-seq analyses reveal low but detectable expression of X2, consistent with weak splice site predictions that suggest strict regulatory control and condition-specific expression. Despite its rarity, recurrent mutations in exon X2 are reported in cancer datasets, implying possible roles in disease. Structural modeling further indicates that X2 contributes to a flexible, disordered region within the β-propeller domain, potentially influencing laminin binding or β-subunit dimerization.

conclusionsAltogether, our results suggest that

Indexed as

Integrin alpha6Alternative SplicingAnimalsExonsGenomicsHumansMammalsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultiomicsProtein IsoformsRNA Splice SitesIntegrin alpha6Protein IsoformsRNA Splice Sitesalternative splicinggenome annotationintegrinsITGA

Identifiers

PMID41153352
PMCPMC12564407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.