Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153346›Full record

ReviewGenes2025

Clinical Actionability of Genes in Gastrointestinal Tumors.

Nadia Saoudi Gonzalez, Giorgio Patelli, Giovanni Crisafulli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadia Saoudi GonzalezIFOM-ETS, The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6044-1703
Giorgio PatelliIFOM-ETS, The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8697-2158
Giovanni CrisafulliIFOM-ETS, The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-1555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision oncology is witnessing an increasing number of molecular targets fueled by the continuous improvement of cancer genomics and drug development. Tumor genomic profiling is nowadays (August 2025) part of routine cancer patient care, guiding therapeutic decisions day by day. Nevertheless, implementing and distilling the increasing number of potential gene targets and possible precision drugs into therapeutically relevant actions is a challenge. The availability of prescreening programs for clinical trials has expanded the description of the genomic landscape of gastrointestinal tumors. The selection of the genomic test to use in each clinical situation, the correct interpretation of the results, and ensuring clinically meaningful implications in the context of diverse geographical drug accessibility, economic cost, and access to clinical trials are daily challenges of personalized medicine. In this context, well-established negative predictive biomarkers, such as extended

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGenomicsHumansMutationPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumoractionable gene alterationsgastrointestinal (GI) tumorsprecision oncologypredictive biomarkerstargeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID41153346
PMCPMC12564024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.