ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Diagnostic Technologies.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biophotonics point-of-care diagnostics in low-resource settings: a South African perspective.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- Large Language Model-Generated Differential Diagnoses in Radiology Education: Comparison with a Standard Casebook.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Care: Selected Applications in Tuberculosis, Sepsis, and Antimicrobial Stewardship.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring the needs of technical developers and stakeholders in point-of-care technology development: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence at the frontlines: Emerging infectious and parasitic diseases in the digital era.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, diagnosis and emerging therapies for Lyme disease of the Northern Hemisphere.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Governing synthetic biology and artificial intelligence (AI) convergence: emerging biosecurity priorities for Africa.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Editorial: Machine learning and AI-driven insights into microbial pathogenesis and drug resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in biofilm research: computational approaches for biofilm analysis and antimicrobial prediction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), as an emerging interdisciplinary field dedicated to simulating and extending human intelligence, is increasingly integrating into the domain of infectious disease medicine with unprecedented depth and breadth. This narrative review is based on a systematic literature search in databases such as PubMed and Web of Science for relevant studies published between 2018 and 2025, with the aim of synthesizing the current landscape. It demonstrates transformative potential, particularly in the realm of diagnostic assistance. Confronting global challenges such as pandemic control, emerging infectious diseases, and antimicrobial resistance, AI technologies offer innovative solutions to these pressing issues. Leveraging its robust capabilities in data mining, pattern recognition, and predictive analytics, AI enhances diagnostic efficiency and accuracy, enables real-time monitoring, and facilitates the early detection and intervention of outbreaks. This narrative review systematically examines the application scenarios of AI within infectious disease diagnostics, based on an analysis of recent literature. It highlights significant technological advances and demonstrated practical outcomes related to high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for pathogen surveillance, AI-driven analysis of digital and radiological images, and AI-enhanced point-of-care testing (POCT). Simultaneously, the review critically analyzes the key challenges and limitations hindering the clinical translation of current AI-based diagnostic technologies. These obstacles include data scarcity and quality constraints, limitations in model generalizability, economic and administrative burdens, as well as regulatory and integration barriers. By synthesizing existing research findings and cataloging essential data resources, this review aims to establish a valuable reference framework to guide future in-depth research, from model development and data sourcing to clinical validation and standardization of AI-assisted infectious disease diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.