Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153187›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Seeing Flames, Perceiving Quantity: Approximations of Fire Intensity Across Development.

Justin W Bonny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Justin W BonnyDepartment of Psychology, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-5114

Funding

Wastewater surveillance for addressing environmental health disparitiesU54MD013376 · NIMHD · MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Payam Sheikhattari · 2019 to 2026
$33.5M
National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health U54MD013376NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD013376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between three and six years of age, children become better able to detect smaller differences in non-symbolic visual quantities. This includes judging which set of objects are greater in number and area. These findings suggest that the underlying approximate magnitude representations, which facilitate the estimation of these quantities, become more precise with age into adulthood. Such parallels in developmental trends raise questions about the extent to which they are observed across different non-symbolic quantities. The present study addressed this question using a novel quantity: visual fire intensity. Like number and area, fire intensity can be estimated using visual cues and has real-world implications. However, it is unclear whether young children accurately compare fire intensities and if there are age-related differences in performance. The present study investigated the developmental trend of young children's visual perception of fire intensity. Over 70 three- to six-year-olds completed a comparison task where they judged which of two train engines had a more intense fire. Based on non-symbolic quantity research, the ratio (relative difference) between the intensity of two simulated fires was varied across trials to be smaller versus larger. Significant ratio and age effects were observed: children were more likely to select the train with the greater-intensity fire as being 'more' the larger the ratio and the older the child. These results suggest that young children are sensitive to differences in fire intensity using visual cues and have increasingly precise estimates by six years of age. This developmental pattern indicates that approximate magnitude representations support perceptions of ecologically relevant, dynamic quantities such as fire intensity.

Indexed as

approximate number systemcognitive developmentfire intensitygeneral magnitude systemhuman behavior in fire

Identifiers

PMID41153187
PMCPMC12561452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.