ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Characterizing the Relationship Between Intervention Delivery and Outcomes Within Part C Community Settings.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Family Outcomes of a Community-Based Trial of Project ImPACT.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Routine Early Intervention services are an ideal context to evaluate parent-mediated intervention (PMI) delivery. While effectiveness research suggests that receiving manualized PMIs positively affects caregivers' learning and use of intervention strategies, the impact of other aspects of delivery, such as PMI adaptation, on caregiver engagement and learning is less clear. The current study aimed to address this gap by closely characterizing the delivery and associated outcomes of an autism PMI, Project ImPACT, within an Early Intervention (EI) Part C system. In total, 21 EI providers and 23 caregivers of children with social communication delays participated. Following training in Project ImPACT, the providers submitted videos of their Project ImPACT sessions as part of routine service delivery. The sessions were behaviorally coded for Project ImPACT coaching fidelity and instances in which Project ImPACT was adapted. After each session, the caregivers rated their participatory engagement and therapeutic alliance. Before and immediately following the intervention, the caregivers also completed measures of their self-efficacy and their child's social communication skills, and their use of Project ImPACT strategies (i.e., fidelity) was behaviorally coded. The results demonstrated that EI providers' Project ImPACT coaching fidelity was not related to caregiver ratings of therapeutic alliance or participatory engagement at the session level. Augmenting Project ImPACT sessions was associated with higher caregiver ratings of therapeutic alliance but not with participatory engagement. Although provider coaching fidelity was not associated with changes in caregiver ratings of self-efficacy, it was associated with caregiver use of Project ImPACT strategies focused on teaching their children new skills. There was no association between provider fidelity and caregiver report of child social communication outcomes. The current study highlights the complicated relationship between the delivery of autism PMIs and caregiver-reported outcomes. The findings highlight the value of holistic delivery models that support adaptations in response to child- and family-level factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.