Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153124›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Dynamic Approach to Compulsive Fantasy: Constraints and Creativity in "Maladaptive Daydreaming".

Jennifer I Burrell, Emily Lawson, Kalina Christoff Hadjiilieva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer I BurrellDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2130-4962
Emily LawsonDepartment of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4350-2089
Kalina Christoff HadjiilievaDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2841-8647

Funding

CIHR PJT-168974Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2025-06723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compulsive fantasy, often called "maladaptive daydreaming," involves frequent engagement with immersive fantasies that can sometimes interfere with everyday life and cause distress. This paper expands on Christoff and colleagues' Dynamic Framework of Thought (DFT) to offer a process-based analysis of compulsive fantasy as it relates to other mental phenomena such as daydreaming and creative thought. Drawing on the existing literature and posts on online forums by self-identified maladaptive daydreamers, we also propose an account of how compulsive fantasy episodes may unfold in terms of the oscillating dynamics of various constraints on thought, and how these dynamics may be related to a perceived struggle with agency. Automatic constraints, including affective salience and mental habits, may bring about a fantasy episode. During a fantasy episode, automatic constraints may be relatively high throughout, whereas deliberate constraints may be intermittently engaged to influence the fantasy. Our analysis supports the use of "compulsive fantasy" as a more accurate designation than "maladaptive daydreaming" for this phenomenon: compulsive fantasies are not daydreams, because they are more constrained in their mental dynamics. We show that fantasy and daydreaming are not inherently harmful but can become so when they are accompanied by relatively strong and sustained automatic constraints on thought.

Indexed as

compulsioncompulsive fantasycreativitydaydreamingfantasyimaginationmaladaptive daydreamingmind-wanderingspontaneous thoughtthe Dynamic Framework of Thought

Identifiers

PMID41153124
PMCPMC12562237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.