ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Less training, better improvement: effects of velocity-based complex training on lower-limb maximal strength and explosive performance in highly-trained volleyball athletes.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Velocity-Based French Contrast Training on Lower-Limb Power and Delivery Kinetics in Medium-Fast Cricket Bowlers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The effect of velocity-based strength training on lower limb maximal strength, power, and muscle thickness: a comparative study of sex-specific adaptations.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis randomized controlled trial compared the effects of velocity-based complex training (VBCT) and traditional complex training (TCT) on lower-limb maximal strength and explosive performance in male volleyball athletes during the competitive season.
methodsThirty athletes were randomly assigned to VBCT (n = 10), TCT (n = 10), or a control group (CON, n = 10). The VBCT and TCT groups trained twice weekly for eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included 1RM squat, countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), eccentric utilization rate (EUR), and standing long jump (SLJ).
resultsBoth VBCT and TCT improved 1RM squat, CMJ, SJ, and SLJ, whereas only VBCT improved EUR (p < 0.01). Post-intervention, VBCT demonstrated significantly greater improvements than TCT in CMJ (VBCT: η² = 0.65; TCT: η² = 0.41) and EUR (VBCT: η² = 0.45; TCT: η² = 0.07) (p < 0.05). Training intensity did not differ between groups (p > 0.05), but VBCT showed lower training volume, fewer repetitions, and lower rating of perceived exertion, while exhibiting higher mean concentric velocity for each repetition within squat sets compared with TCT (p < 0.01).
conclusionsVBCT resulted in greater improvements in CMJ and EUR, while its effects on 1RM, SJ, and SLJ were similar to TCT. With lower volume and fatigue, VBCT may be a more efficient strategy for enhancing lower-limb strength and explosiveness during the competitive season.
trial registrationThis study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) with the following details: Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093910. Registration Date: 13/12/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.