ArticleHuman genomics2025
Integrated genetic and geographic ancestry prediction via large-scale genomic data and machine learning.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding fine-scale genetic and geographic ancestry in East and Southeast Asia is difficult due to complex population histories and limited high-resolution genomic data. Here, we introduce a comprehensive framework that combines ancestry-informative single nucleotide polymorphism (AISNP) panels with machine learning to jointly determine genetic ancestry and geographic origins in 1,703 individuals from 67 East and Southeast Asian groups. We developed seven nested AISNP panels, from 50 to 2,000 SNPs, and tested six classification algorithms: logistic regression, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, convolutional neural networks, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The best results came from the optimized XGBoost model, which achieved 95.6% accuracy and an AUC of 0.999 with 2,000 AISNPs. For geographic localization, we used the Locator model, a deep neural network that predicts latitude and longitude directly from unphased genotypes. Notably, Locator trained on just 2,000 AISNPs performed nearly as well as models built on high-density genomic data (597,569 SNPs). Overall, these findings show that carefully designed AISNP panels combined with suitable machine learning techniques can provide highly accurate and efficient ancestry inference, offering valuable insights for population genetics, forensic science, and biogeography in East and Southeast Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.