ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Evaluating survival trends over time in patients with metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases: a single center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of subsequent-line therapies for advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 20–30% of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) develop brain metastases (BM) over the course of their disease. It is critical to better understand risk factors and survival outcomes in these patients, including those treated in the modern treatment era.
methodsWe identified patients with MBC and BM diagnosed between 1997 and 2024 at our institution. Review of medical records was completed to identify key demographic, clinical, and survival characteristics.
resultsWe identified 507 patients with MBC and BMs with the following subtypes: HR+/HER2- (n = 184, 36.3%), HER2+ (n = 197, 38.9%), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 126, 24.9%). Median real-world overall survival (rwOS) from the diagnosis of first BM to death was 21.6 months with the longest median rwOS in patients with HER2+ disease (31.0 months) vs. patients with HR+/HER2- (19.6 months) or TNBC (12.8 months) (p < 0.001). By date of BM diagnosis 1997–2014 vs. 2015–2024 (divided by ~ 50% of patients in each time period), patients with HER2+ and TNBC lived longer in the more modern cohort compared to prior years (HER2+: 41.2 vs. 26.2 months, p = 0.002; TNBC: 14.9 vs. 7.0 p = 0.020). There was no statistically significant difference for patients with HR+/HER2- disease (16.5 vs. 21.6, p = 0.089). On multivariable analysis, HER2+ disease (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.81, p < 0.001), BM surgical resection (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51–0.87, p = 0.002), and BM diagnosis after 2014 (HR 0.77, CI 0.63–0.95, p = 0.015) were associated with longer survival. TNBC (HR 1.46, CI 1.12–1.89, p = 0.004), having 6–10 BMs at baseline (HR 1.66, CI 1.14–2.42, p = 0.009), extracranial MBC (HR 1.34 CI 1.02–1.76, p = 0.034) and development of leptomeningeal disease (HR 1.41, CI 1.11–1.80, p = 0.005) were associated with shorter survival.
conclusionIn a cohort of > 500 patients with MBC BMs spanning > 25 years, median rwOS from the diagnosis of first BM was almost two years. Favorable factors included HER2+ disease, BM surgical resection, and diagnosis after 2014. Poor prognostic factors included TNBC, having 6–10 BMs, extracranial MBC, and development of LMD. Patients with HER2+ and TN MBC with BM had improved rwOS in a more modern cohort; this was not seen for HR+/HER2- patients, representing an area of ongoing unmet clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.