Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153012›Full record

ReviewResearch involvement and engagement2025

Patient and public involvement in secure mental health research: setting-specific considerations and a protocol for involvement in the CORAS study (COllaborative Risk ASsessment and management).

Naomi Clifford, Catherine Jeynes, Ian Callaghan, Sheena Foster, Sarah Markham, Hannah Moore, Katrina Forsyth, Brian Crosbie, Seena Fazel, Daniel Whiting

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Naomi CliffordNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. D Floor, Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Catherine JeynesNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. D Floor, Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. catherine.jeynes2@nottshc.nhs.uk.
Ian CallaghanRethink Mental Illness, Lived Experience Programmes Team, Berkshire, UK.
Sheena Foster, Carer, UK.
Sarah MarkhamKing's College London, London, UK.
Hannah MooreExpert by Experience, London, UK.
Katrina ForsythSocial Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Brian CrosbieSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Seena Fazel *Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel Whiting *Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. D Floor, Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR206609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is important in secure psychiatric research because it can help ensure that research is relevant and meaningful, and a positive experience for those participating. However, there are significant challenges to embedding PPIE in research in secure hospital settings, including practical barriers to involvement. A lack of reporting of PPIE practices makes it harder for researchers to learn from previous projects, leading to missed opportunities to improve PPIE in secure settings, and there are no current setting-specific guidelines for best practice. The CORAS study aims to examine collaborative risk assessment within secure psychiatric settings. In this study, PPIE is fully integrated throughout the research cycle, and this protocol describes the PPIE methodology being adopted. By highlighting these approaches and principles, this protocol is intended to be used as a transferrable framework for developing best practice for PPIE in research in these settings.

methodThis protocol describes the ways in which we will ensure that PPIE remains central to each stage of the research project, from the formation of a smaller grant application PPIE group, through to dissemination of outputs. We discuss principles of recruitment into the PPIE group, ensuring that all areas of the secure mental health pathway are represented, and formally embracing equality, diversity and inclusion principles through the use of an Equality Impact Assessment. We also describe the core activities of the PPIE group, including the co-design of the research materials, recruitment strategies and dissemination plans, how the impact of PPIE will be examined, and practical elements such as around reimbursement and ensuring the wellbeing of PPIE group members.

conclusionsPPIE in secure mental health service research is important and challenging. This protocol outlines how we will address these challenges and ensure that PPIE is fully embedded in the design and delivery of a large study in secure settings. Although the prospective nature of this protocol precludes the sharing of outcomes and learning from the PPIE, it can nevertheless serve as a transferrable framework for the development that is urgently required in this clinical research field, as well as allow transparent future reporting of what was achieved.

Identifiers

PMID41153012
PMCPMC12570442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.