ArticleGenome medicine2025
Discriminating activating, deactivating and resistance variants in protein kinases.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDistinguishing whether genetic variants in protein kinases cause gain or loss of function is critical in clinical genetics. In particular, gain (and not loss)-of-function variants are often immediately amenable to treatment by inhibitors, making their identification a potential boon to personalised medicine. Most existing computational methods for variant pathogenicity prediction simply distinguish damaging from benign variants and provide no further functional insights. Here, we present a data-driven approach that differentiates activating, deactivating, and resistance variants.
methodsTo train and evaluate our method, we curated a dataset of 2505 variants (375 activating, 1028 deactivating, 98 resistance and 1004 neutral) across 441 kinases from the literature and public databases. Each variant was represented as a vector of sequence, evolutionary and structural features, which we then used to train machine learning models to distinguish among the four types of variants. The resulting predictors achieved excellent performance (mean AUC = 0.941). We tested a selection of variants by over-expression in T-REx-293 cells followed by gene expression or biochemical tests.
resultsApplying the predictors to uncharacterised variants, we observed a strong enrichment of activating mutations in cancer genomes, deactivating variants in hereditary disease, and few of either in variants from healthy individuals. We experimentally validated several predicted activating variants from cancer samples. For p.Ser97Asn in PIM1, phosphorylation events suggested increased activity. For p.Ala84Thr in MAP2K3, gene expression and mitochondrial staining showed a reduction in mitochondrial function, the opposite effect of MAP2K3 deletions. We provide an online application that enables users to analyse any kinase-domain variant, obtain prediction scores and explore known nearby variants in other kinases.
conclusionsOur predictors, together with the rapid experimental validations, demonstrates a feasible strategy for identifying activating variants in kinases in a time frame that would enable clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.