ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Current developments in orthopaedic implant technology.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A clinically translatable coating-free strategy for 3D-printed porous titanium implants: TiOBioactive materials · 2026Article
- Biomaterial-Driven Modulation of Macrophage Polarization in an Experimental Environment of Implant-Associated Infection Mediated byJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Multiscale Interface Engineering for Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Laser-Engineered Multilayer Coatings Based on Zinc Oxide and Lovastatin-Functionalized Bioactive Glasses for Corrosion-Resistant and Antimicrobial Stainless Steel Implants.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced additive manufacturing in orthopedics: a comprehensive review of biomaterials, structural design, biological functions and clinical technology applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Animal models for critical-sized long-bone defects and long-bone non-union: a scoping review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopaedic implants have significantly improved the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries and degenerative diseases, restoring function and alleviating pain. However, long-term implant success remains challenging due to loosening, wear, and infections. Recent advancements in materials science, bioengineering, and digital technologies are driving innovations in orthopaedic implants, enhancing their performance and patient outcomes. New biomaterials, such as advanced metal alloys, polymers, ceramics, and nanocomposites, offer superior biocompatibility and mechanical durability, minimizing adverse reactions. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) allows the creation of patient-specific implants with porous architectures closely resembling natural bone, enhancing osseointegration. Additionally, surface engineering techniques, including bioactive coatings for improved bone bonding and antimicrobial layers for infection prevention, address persistent issues at the implant-tissue interface. The emergence of "smart" implants equipped with sensors and wireless connectivity enables real-time monitoring of biomechanical parameters, paving the way for personalized, data-driven orthopaedic care. This review summarizes significant developments in orthopaedic implant technology from 2020 to 2025, highlighting advances in materials, design, and functionality. We discuss how these innovations address traditional challenges and examine remaining hurdles to clinical application. Future directions, such as biodegradable implants that eliminate secondary surgeries and AI-assisted implant design, are also explored. Collectively, these breakthroughs promise a new era in orthopaedic treatments, marked by enhanced implant longevity, functionality, and patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.