ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025
Exploring social determinants of disability among older filipinos: insights from a polysocial score approach.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid aging in the Philippines presents significant challenges, including high rates of activities of daily living (ADL) disability among older adults. While research has identified various social determinants of ADL disability, there is a gap in understanding how their joint impact on disability among older Filipinos. We adopted the polysocial score approach to assess these joint associations of multiple social factors with disability among older adults in the Philippines.
methodsIndividuals included in the analysis were from the Longitudinal Study of Ageing and Health in the Philippines. Twenty-nine social factors from five domains were included. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model was employed to identify and rank key social determinants, which were then incorporated into a logistic regression model to derive the polysocial score, both continuously and in categories and assessed its association with ADL disability. Model performances were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and reclassification (compared to a reference model). All analyses were separated for men and women.
resultsWe included 5,000 participants (37.0% men) with an average age of 68.3 years. The polysocial score included 19 social factors for men and 18 for women. Among men, the most significant predictors were the frequency of engaging in social activities and the number of friends they had contact with. Attending religious services outside the home and the frequency of attending social activities were the most important factors for women. Eleven social factors overlapped between men and women. Individuals with moderate or high polysocial scores exhibited reduced likelihood of experiencing ADL disability relative to those with low scores. We observed satisfactory model performance among men and women.
conclusionsWe identified important social factors for men and women and their joint association with ADL disability. The polysocial score could be used to design person-centered social interventions that promote health and support independence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.