ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
Recent advances in theranostic nanomaterials for overcoming traumatic brain injury.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanozyme-based therapeutic strategies for traumatic brain injury.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Neddylation-dependent CUL3-KLHL12 E3 ligase drives microglial oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury by targeting GCLM for degradation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Innovative Biomaterials for Modulating Neuroinflammation and Promoting Repair After Traumatic Brain Injury.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors for traumatic brain injury biomarker detection: a review of analytical performance, machine learning integration, clinical validation, and point-of-care translation.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Multifunctional nanozyme platforms in central nervous system therapies: from rational design to translational medicine.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Multiple Application Strategies of Carbon Dots in Cancer Treatment: Mechanisms, Progress and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health challenge characterized by complex secondary injury mechanisms involving oxidative stress, inflammation, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption. Traditional biosensing and therapy strategies often face limitations due to ineffective biomarker detection and poor drug targeting at the injury site. Recently, theranostic nanomaterials have emerged as a promising solution, integrating diagnostic and therapeutic functionalities within a single nanoscale platform. This review explores the latest advances in nanotherapeutics and nanosensors for TBI management. The first section summarizes various nanotherapeutic approaches, including PEGylated-polystyrene nanoparticles, porous silicon nanoparticles, carbon dot nanoparticles, dendrimer nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), and siRNA-based nanoparticles, all of which have demonstrated enhanced neuroprotection and targeted drug delivery in TBIs. Notably, LNPs exhibit further optimized biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy, while carbon dot nanoparticles function as nanozymes to combat oxidative stress, thereby mitigating neuronal damage. The second section focuses on nanosensors for TBIs, including peptide-based nanosensors, ECM-targeted nanosensors, and biomarker-responsive platforms capable of real-time diagnosis and monitoring of TBI progression. Additionally, the use of polymeric and fibrinogen-based nanosensors is discussed as advanced strategies to improve precision detection and therapeutic control. This review provides a comprehensive overview of theranostic nanomaterials for TBIs, highlighting their transformative potential in diagnosis and targeted treatment, while addressing key translational challenges to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.