Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152913›Full record

Observational studyReproductive health2025

Understanding the support needs and preferences of people who self-managed abortion with accompaniment group support in Argentina, Nigeria, and Southeast Asia: a prospective, observational cohort study.

Marissa Velarde, Ruvani Jayaweera, Ijeoma Egwuatu, Sybil Nmezi, Ruth Zurbriggen, Belén Grosso, Ika Ayu Kristianingrum, Chiara Bercu, Heidi Moseson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marissa VelardeDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. mkvel@unc.edu.
Ruvani JayaweeraIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.
Ijeoma EgwuatuGeneration Initiative for Women and Youth, Lagos, Nigeria.
Sybil NmeziGeneration Initiative for Women and Youth, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ruth ZurbriggenLa Revuelta Colectiva Feminista, Neuquén, Argentina.
Belén GrossoLa Revuelta Colectiva Feminista, Neuquén, Argentina.
Ika Ayu KristianingrumSamsara, Java, Indonesia.
Chiara BercuIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.
Heidi MosesonIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasingly, people use medication abortion pills to end their pregnancies on their own, without clinical supervision-a practice known as self-managed abortion (SMA). Additionally, some obtain support through a community-based care model known as the "accompaniment" model, in which volunteer-activists provide evidence-based information about medication abortion and counseling through the SMA process over the phone or in-person. Understanding factors associated with the support and care received during SMA with accompaniment can provide insight into people's satisfaction with this community-based model of abortion care and identify opportunities to further improve it, which is particularly important in legally restrictive settings. Additionally, a large proportion of people who have abortions are parents, but little research has explored the unique needs and preferences for SMA among parents.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of a prospective, observational cohort study conducted in three countries among people who self-managed an abortion with accompaniment support. We implemented bivariate analyses to evaluate differences between participants who reported feeling sufficient social support during their abortion with those who did not, and those who preferred SMA over facility-based care. We used multivariable logistic regression models to explore whether the number of children a participant had was associated with feeling supported during the SMA process, and separately with preference for SMA.

resultsWhile most participants felt fully supported by their social group and preferred SMA, several characteristics were associated with not having felt supported and preferring facility-based abortion care in bivariate analyses: namely, those with less formal education, a history of prior abortion, and those who sought care at a health facility during their SMA. In adjusted logistic regression models, we found no association between number of children and feeling sufficient social support, or preference for SMA.

conclusionsThese results establish that most people who have SMA with accompaniment feel fully supported during their abortion process and prefer SMA over facility-based care with no difference between parents and non-parents.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedPatient PreferenceSelf-ManagementSocial SupportAdultArgentinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansNigeriaPregnancyProspective StudiesYoung AdultAbortionAccompanimentAfricaMedication abortionSelf-managed abortionSouth americaSoutheast asia

Identifiers

PMID41152913
PMCPMC12570750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.