ArticleBMC medical education2025
Optimization of the non-living animal models for simulation-based microsurgical training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLiving animal models have been widely used for microsurgical training. Due to ethical concerns and animal care costs, non-living animal training models have gained significant popularity. The chicken thigh model has become a gold standard for preclinical microsurgical training. Efforts to optimize this model by using vessel perfusion have been previously reported. This study aims to further optimize the chicken thigh training model and to suggest a novel porcine rib model based on the implementation of the pulsatile perfusion technique.
methodsTwenty optimized chicken thigh (OCTM) and twenty novel porcine rib (NPRM) training models were prepared. Model morphological parameters, preparation time, and cost were analyzed. A peristaltic pump was used for arterial perfusion, and the infusion bag was used for venous system perfusion. Training models were used for vessel dissection, microvascular anastomosis performance, and patency evaluation. Sixteen microsurgeons were invited to evaluate the surgical fidelity of both training models.
resultsTraining model preparation time was 20.7 ± 1.9 min and 18.2 ± 1.5 min for the OCTM and the NPRM, respectively. The average artery and vein diameter (2.3 ± 0.2 mm and 2.9 ± 0.2 mm in OCTM; 1.7 ± 0.2 mm and 1.6 ± 0.2 mm in NPRM) were applicable for the broad spectrum of microvascular exercises. The arterial pulsatile flow was visually detectable and allowed side branch visualization and management. The average cost of the model was 10.7 ± 0.7 euro for OCTM and 14.1 ± 0.7 euro for NPRM. OCTM and NPRM demonstrated high surgical fidelity (OCTM: 0.86 ± 0.06; NPRM: 0.78 ± 0.1; p = 0.01) compared to the reference model (0.96 ± 0.02).
conclusionsThe optimized non-living animal models represent efficient, reliable, and cost-effective alternatives to living-animal models for microsurgical training at different levels of expertise. Suggested models present a highly realistic simulation of pulsatile blood flow and can be effectively used to train vessel dissection, side branch management, microvascular anastomosis, bleeding control, and anastomosis patency evaluation. Perfused pulsatile non-living animal training models can be incorporated into the microsurgery training curriculum and may significantly enhance complex microsurgical skills and reduce surgical anxiety in young specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.