ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Which dominates recurrence: tumor or microenvironment?
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a major challenge in oncology due to its high recurrence rate, highlighting the need to identify recurrence drivers. Based on the data provided by Zhang Zemin’s team in their research, we selected survival metadata from 119 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma and data on the proportions of 51 immune cell types. We then combined machine learning methods to analyze the intrinsic tumor factors and tumor microenvironment (TME) in the recurrence of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Chi-square tests identified immune cell subsets enriched in recurrent patients, such as high-MKI67 Tregs, low-FGFBP2 NK cells, low-FOXP3 Tregs, and low-KLRB1 CD8 + T cells. A random forest algorithm further pinpointed pathological response rate (PRR) as the primary predictive factor, with high-MKI67 Tregs as a key secondary contributor. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirmed that pathological complete response (pCR) and low Treg_MKI67 expression were associated with better survival (p = 0.0055 and p = 0.011, respectively). Patients achieving pCR and with low Treg_MKI67 expression had superior recurrence-free survival (RFS; 2-year RFS: 96.7% vs. 57.9% for non-pCR and high Treg_MKI67, p = 0.00066). These findings underscore the prognostic value of PRR and TME markers. They also highlight the potential of using single-cell RNA sequencing and machine learning to guide personalized therapies and reduce recurrence risk by targeting Treg activity, laying the groundwork for integrating immune markers into clinical practice to improve LUSC prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.