ArticleBMC health services research2025
Preparing tomorrow's health entrepreneurs: a collaborative multi-stakeholder approach to identifying core competencies and training needs of future professionals.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth systems face complex and multifaceted challenges that require health professionals (including clinicians, nurses and other health workers) to be equipped with entrepreneurship and innovation (E&I) competencies. However, the integration of E&I training within health university curricula remains largely underexplored across different countries and educational contexts. This study aimed to identify core E&I competencies and aligned training needs for future health professionals through a structured, multi-stakeholder approach.
methodsShaped within a value-focused thinking framework (systematically linking competencies as end goals with educational topics as means to achieve competencies), the study comprised three stages: (1) a scoping review (ScR) combined with qualitative content analysis (QCA) to identify and categorise E&I competencies and course topics documented in literature, alongside a value-driven competencies-topics relevance matrix; (2) a 3-round web-Delphi process involving a diverse panel of health stakeholders who validated and refined competencies and course topics lists (presented as pre-built thematic maps within the web-Delphi platform), and assessed course topics' relevance for developing specific E&I competencies; (3) a facilitated virtual workshop to discuss Delphi results and implications for higher education.
resultsThe ScR included twenty-nine studies. QCA of these studies produced initial lists of 28 competencies (grouped into five E&I domains of competency) and 34 course topics, organized into thematic maps. Through the responses of 29 Delphi participants, these lists were expanded to a final set of 51 competencies and 55 competency-aligned course topics. Participants rated 91% of topics as at least strongly relevant for developing the respective E&I domain of competency. The workshop provided insights on implementing formal E&I training within health education curricula, with specific reference to the Portuguese context.
conclusionsResults provide educational institutions with a practical starting point for reflecting on and designing profession-specific E&I courses and enhancing existing graduate programs through targeted E&I competency integration. Findings have significant implications for health workforce education and planning, particularly in promoting competency-driven E&I curricula to enhance professionals' readiness for current and future healthcare system challenges. This study presents an innovative multi-stakeholder collaborative approach for mapping E&I competencies and aligned topics for training health professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.