ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
A qualitative study of patient's experiences of receiving alcohol interventions according to the 15-method in psychiatric care.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- I am in the passenger seat of my own body: a qualitative interview study of the relationship between binge eating and concurrent problematic alcohol use.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimComorbidity between psychiatric disorders and alcohol use disorders (AUD) is common. Swedish national guidelines recommend integrated treatment for both disorders, however, compliance to the guidelines is low. To facilitate uptake, health care staff at psychiatric units in Region Stockholm, Sweden, have participated in training and implementation of the 15-method for screening and treatment of AUD. Few studies focus on the patient perspective of interventions for AUD in psychiatric care. The aim of this study was to investigate how patients in psychiatric outpatient care perceived receiving interventions according to the 15-method, within the context of a large-scale implementation project.
methodsQualitative study with data collected through individual interviews involving 15 adults who had Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) score >6 for women/ >8 for men and contact with a psychiatric unit whose staff had taken part in the implementation project of the 15-method. The interviews were analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis using the four constructs of the Normalization Process Theory; coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring, as a framework.
resultsAll participants had received alcohol screening, four had received the assessment in the second step in the 15-method, three received pharmacotherapy, however, none reported receiving the psychological treatment. A majority found it natural to discuss alcohol within the psychiatric care setting and described that these conversations led to increased awareness about their hazardous alcohol consumption (coherence). Alcohol use was perceived as a sensitive topic and staff attitude was important to create a working alliance (cognitive participation). Conversation about alcohol could evoke behavior change but few participants had been offered alcohol interventions beyond screening (collective action) and expressed a wish to receive more support (reflexive monitoring). Treatment for psychiatric symptoms was described as conditioned to non-hazardous level of alcohol consumption (coherence), leading to active actions to become eligible for treatment (cognitive participation). Moreover, conditioning of care mainly led to short-term behavior changes (reflexive monitoring).
conclusionsPatients in psychiatric care are positive to receiving alcohol-interventions within this context, indicating that psychiatric care offers a window of opportunity to address comorbidity. However, future staff training and implementation initiatives should be tailored to the specific challenges in psychiatric care, such as conditioning of care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.