ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Estimation of median effective doses and 95% effective doses of oliceridine combined with propofol for day-case hysteroscopy under total intravenous anesthesia with preserved spontaneous breathing: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOliceridine is a novel developed G protein-biased µ-opioid receptor agonist, offering a significant reduction in the risk of opioid-related respiratory depression and a lower incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects. This sequential dose-finding study was conducted to determine the median effective doses (ED₅₀) and 95% effective doses (ED₉₅) of oliceridine coadministered with propofol during day-case hysteroscopy under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with preserved spontaneous breathing (PSB), thereby supporting the optimization of clinical anesthesia protocols.
methodsIn the study, 31 women undergoing day-case hysteroscopy were included. All patients were given a specific dose of oliceridine combined with propofol (2.5 mg/kg). A modified Dixon up-and-down sequential approach was adopted, with the starting dose of oliceridine set at 1.5 mg. The dosage of oliceridine was adjusted according to the response of the previous patient: a positive response led to an increased dose, while a negative response prompted a decrease, with a fixed dose ratio of 1:1.2. A positive response was defined as the occurrence of involuntary movement, frowning, or an MOAA/S score > 1 during cervical dilatation. The formal trial commenced from the first crossover and continued until seven crossovers were observed. Using the probit model, the ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Secondary outcome measures included the time to anesthesia emergence, the VAS scores at PACU entry and discharge, the incidence of PONV, and the number of patients requiring analgesics in the PACU.
resultsFor day-case hysteroscopy, the estimated ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of oliceridine in combination with 2.5 mg/kg propofol were 1.309 mg (95% CI: 1.165–1.477 mg) and 1.675 mg (95% CI: 1.497–2.508 mg), respectively. All patients maintained spontaneous respiration throughout the procedure, and no episodes of respiratory depression were observed. The mean time to anesthesia emergence ranged from 3 to 4 min. The VAS scores at PACU entry and discharge remained below 3 in all patients, and no supplemental analgesics were required. No gastrointestinal adverse events were observed in the PACU.
conclusionsGiven its lower incidence of opioid-related adverse effects, oliceridine combined with propofol may offer a promising and well-tolerated approach for day-case hysteroscopy under TIVA with PSB. The estimated ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of oliceridine in combination with propofol (2.5 mg/kg) were 1.309 mg (95% CI: 1.165–1.477 mg) and 1.675 mg (95% CI: 1.497–2.508 mg), respectively. These findings provide a reference for optimizing clinical dosing strategies.
trial registrationThe trial was officially registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=252762 ) on December 25, 2024, with the registration number ChiCTR2400094657.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.