ArticleBMC primary care2025
Meaningful work experiences of certified primary care physicians in Japan: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to explore what experiences certified primary care physicians (PCPs) in Japan found meaningful in their work.
methodBetween October 2021 and February 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Japan Primary Care Association (JPCA)-certified family physicians or JPCA Diplomates in primary care who were working at clinics or small hospitals in Japan regarding "work experiences that they felt were meaningful as physician's work". The interviews were conducted face-to-face or via video call. The data obtained were transcribed verbatim and data analysis was conducted using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsFourteen physicians participated in the interview survey. Six themes were identified regarding work experiences that PCPs found meaningful: 1) management of diverse health problems, 2) comprehensive approach to patients, their families, and their issues, 3) trust relationships with patients built by continuity, 4) experience supporting patients with complex problems through interprofessional collaboration, 5) contribution to healthcare provider and medical student education, and 6) contribution to the community and society.
conclusionPCPs appear to find meaning in their work through two main pathways. First, they improve their own clinical abilities through practice. Second, they experience fulfillment by contributing to patients and the broader community. This clarification of the specific experiences of PCPs that are related to the meaning of work could potentially encourage PCPs working in various settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.