Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152661›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026

Advancing Participatory Approaches in Global Migrant Research: A Roundtable Discussion.

Maria Gabriela Uribe Guajardo, Jasmin Lilian Diab, Gwenetta Curry, Muriel Lamarque, Jose Mazariego, Erica Briozzo, Kristefer Stojanovski, Nazmy Villarroel, Ozge Karadag, Shameran Slewa-Younan and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Gabriela Uribe GuajardoThe Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. gabriela.uribe@sydney.edu.au.
Jasmin Lilian DiabInstitute for Migration Studies, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Gwenetta CurryUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Muriel LamarqueInstitute of Social Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Jose MazariegoCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, United States.
Erica BriozzoDepartment of Applied Psychology Research Center, Capability and Inclusion , Ispa-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Kristefer StojanovskiCelia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, United States.
Nazmy VillarroelInstitute of Social Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ozge KaradagFaculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Shameran Slewa-YounanMental Health, Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Kathleen CraveroCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, United States.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1198477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers and policy-makers alike increasingly recognise the importance of engaging diverse perspectives in global migrant research. There is a shift toward more community-led, co-produced, and decolonial approaches that centre migrants as active collaborators in research design, implementation, and dissemination. The aims are to explore [1] the use of participatory approaches in global migration research; [2] genuine participatory approaches or 'best practice' in participatory approaches to migration research and [3] barriers and facilitators for participatory research at a global level. This study used a qualitative design in the form of a structured roundtable discussion. The roundtable was held virtually in 2024 with 16 individual participants from nine countries, with expertise in migration research and practice. The session lasted two hours and was moderated by two facilitators, with open-ended questions designed to elicit reflections on participatory approaches in migrant research. The themes were: use of participatory approaches, best practices, and barriers and facilitators to participation. Participants highlighted key participatory methods commonly used, including the 'use of frameworks', the use as 'researchers as social agents' or intermediaries to amplify migrant community voices and the use of 'community-led direction'. Best practices included the prioritisation of measurable benefits for the community itself, ensuring sustained engagement, from inception to the completion of the project and beyond and avoiding the use of generalising methodologies. Limitations identified were discrimination faced by migrant communities, continued relocation, or misalignment with research funder expectations were also noted. Enablers were the building of community trust, the use of innovative and flexible research funding models, and the establishment of knowledge exchanges between communities and researchers. Future lines of action include addressing these challenges through innovative models such as trust-based philanthropy, and emphasising the need for genuine engagement and community agency - and the inclusion of frontline worker perspectives in research.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchTransients and MigrantsHumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignGlobal Migrants in Big Cities NetworkGood PracticesMigrant ResearchParticipatory ApproachesRoundtable

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.