ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Analysis of clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer based on macroscopic classification.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An epithelial mesenchymal transition associated gene signature stratifies risk of ulcerative colitis associated colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Statistics and epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal neoplasia.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFew studies have reported the association of macroscopic classification with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UC-CRC), unlike sporadic CRC. In this study, we aimed to clarify the clinical significance of macroscopic classification of UC-CRC.
methodsThe cohort included 480 patients with UC-CRC with invasion beyond the muscularis propria treated at 43 Japanese institutions between 1983 and 2023. The patients were divided into six groups based on the macroscopic type (types 0-5), and clinicopathological features and prognoses were compared.
resultsAmong 480 patients, 66 (13.8%), 75 (15.6%), 116 (24.2%), 63 (13.1%), 68 (14.2%), and 92 (19.2%) had type 0-5 tumors, respectively. There were significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics with a younger age in type 4 or 5 tumors than in type 2 tumors (p < 0.01) and a higher frequency of undifferentiated carcinomas (p < 0.01) and lymph node metastasis (p < 0.01) and more advanced depth of invasion (p < 0.01) in type 4 tumors than in type 1 or 2 tumors. Type 4 and 5 were independent risk factors for 5-year recurrence-free survival (p = 0.02; type 4 [HR: 6.35], type 5 [HR: 5.25]) and type 0, 4, and 5 for overall survival (p = 0.02; type 0 [HR: 4.51], type 4 [HR: 5.70], type 5 [HR: 4.02]).
conclusionsType 0, 4, and 5 tumors were characteristic macroscopic types of UC-CRC and correlated with worse prognosis. Therefore, endoscopic diagnosis of the macroscopic type of UC-CRC might be helpful in determining tumor aggressiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.