ArticleScientific reports2025
Bayesian-optimized machine learning boosts actual evapotranspiration prediction in water-stressed agricultural regions of China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate estimation of actual evapotranspiration (AET) is crucial for sustainable water resource management, especially in water-scarce and agriculturally intensive regions like Beijing and Tianjin, China. Traditional methods for AET estimation, whether empirical or physically based, often face limitations due to high data requirements, limited scalability, and sensitivity to input uncertainties. This creates a critical research gap in providing reliable AET predictions under data-limited conditions. To address this, we evaluated the efficacy of integrating four advanced machine learning (ML) models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Ensemble Tree, and Neural Network, with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization for AET modeling using the high-resolution TerraClimate dataset spanning 1958–2022. Key meteorological variables, including maximum and minimum temperature (Tmax and Tmin), solar radiation (SR), wind speed (WS), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and precipitation (PPT), were selected through rigorous correlation and multicollinearity analyses. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) on a 75:25 train-test split. Results demonstrate that the optimizable GPR model achieved the highest predictive accuracy (RMSE = 5.54, R2 = 0.98 on test data), outperforming other ML approaches and traditional empirical models. PPT, Tmin, and Tmax emerged as the most influential predictors for AET. Our findings reveal that ML models, particularly when optimized via Bayesian techniques, yield a robust, scalable, and data-efficient alternative for AET estimation in regions with limited meteorological records. This study establishes a new benchmark for AET modeling, with significant implications for irrigation scheduling, drought monitoring, and integrated water management in the North China Plain and comparable agro-ecological regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.