Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152585›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Bayesian-optimized machine learning boosts actual evapotranspiration prediction in water-stressed agricultural regions of China.

Ahmed Elbeltagi, Aman Srivastava, Xinchun Cao, Vinay Kumar Gautam, Bilel Zerouali, Muhammad Rizwan Aslam, Ali Salem, Hojjat Emami, Elsayed Ahmed Elsadek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed ElbeltagiCollege of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, China.
Aman SrivastavaFormerly, Centre for Technology Alternatives for Rural Areas (CTARA), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Xinchun CaoCollege of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, China. caoxinchun@hhu.edu.cn.
Vinay Kumar GautamSchool of Natural Resource Management, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University, (Imphal), Umiam, Imphal, Meghalaya, 793103, India.
Bilel ZeroualiLaboratory of Architecture, Cities and Environment, Department of Hydraulic, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Chlef, Hassiba Benbouali, B.P. 78C, 02180, Ouled Fares, Chlef, Algeria.
Muhammad Rizwan AslamCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Ali SalemCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia, 61111, Egypt. salem.ali@mik.pte.hu.
Hojjat EmamiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Bonab University, Bonab, Iran.
Elsayed Ahmed ElsadekBiosystems Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate estimation of actual evapotranspiration (AET) is crucial for sustainable water resource management, especially in water-scarce and agriculturally intensive regions like Beijing and Tianjin, China. Traditional methods for AET estimation, whether empirical or physically based, often face limitations due to high data requirements, limited scalability, and sensitivity to input uncertainties. This creates a critical research gap in providing reliable AET predictions under data-limited conditions. To address this, we evaluated the efficacy of integrating four advanced machine learning (ML) models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Ensemble Tree, and Neural Network, with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization for AET modeling using the high-resolution TerraClimate dataset spanning 1958–2022. Key meteorological variables, including maximum and minimum temperature (Tmax and Tmin), solar radiation (SR), wind speed (WS), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and precipitation (PPT), were selected through rigorous correlation and multicollinearity analyses. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) on a 75:25 train-test split. Results demonstrate that the optimizable GPR model achieved the highest predictive accuracy (RMSE = 5.54, R2 = 0.98 on test data), outperforming other ML approaches and traditional empirical models. PPT, Tmin, and Tmax emerged as the most influential predictors for AET. Our findings reveal that ML models, particularly when optimized via Bayesian techniques, yield a robust, scalable, and data-efficient alternative for AET estimation in regions with limited meteorological records. This study establishes a new benchmark for AET modeling, with significant implications for irrigation scheduling, drought monitoring, and integrated water management in the North China Plain and comparable agro-ecological regions.

Indexed as

Agricultural hydrologyAgricultural water managementBayesian optimizationClimate data modelingData-driven evapotranspirationIrrigation scheduling

Identifiers

PMID41152585
PMCPMC12569238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.