SynthesisEuropean geriatric medicine2025
Effectiveness of dual-task exercise in improving balance and preventing falls among older adults: systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Synthesis in European geriatric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07448961 (EFFECTS OF SENSORİAL AND COGNİTİVE INDİVİDUALİZED DUAL-TASK TRAİNİNG ON FUNCTİONAL BALANCE, MOBİLİTY, AND DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE İN OLDER ADULTS), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of sensori̇al and cogni̇ti̇ve indi̇vi̇duali̇zed dual-task trai̇ni̇ng on functi̇onal balance, mobi̇li̇ty, and dual-task performance i̇n older adults: a randomi̇zed controlled tri̇al
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of brain endurance training on mental fatigue, endurance, and cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Dual-Task Exercises for Dynamic Balance, Motor Function, Functional Mobility, and Dual-Tasking in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of Variable Priority Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Training on Cognitive and Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether dual-task (DT) training improves dynamic balance and functional mobility and reduces falls and determine how DT training dosage, including exercise duration, intensity, challenge and adherence, affects treatment outcomes in older adults.
methodsDatabases were searched until May 2025. Methodology, risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tools, respectively. Dynamic balance was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB), and functional mobility using Timed Up and Go (TUG), and falls assessed the frequency of fall.
resultsForty-four studies involving 2782 older adults were included. The mean PEDro score was 6.1, 58% of studies were found to have low risk of bias, and evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate. Meta-analysis indicated that DT exercise significantly improves dynamic balance and functional mobility, and reduces fall frequency. Meta-regression revealed that dynamic balance improved with 95% adherence to 30 min of moderately challenging and moderate-intensity DT training three times per week for four weeks. Functional mobility improved with 95% adherence to 50 min of mildly challenging and moderate-intensity DT training three times per week for 13 weeks.
conclusionDT training improved dynamic balance and functional mobility and reduced falls. The recommended dosages may elicit optimal outcomes. Additional meta-regression analyses are needed to determine the impact of DT training dosage on falls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.